The name Maurice Opar has resurfaced in public discourse, not for business accolades, but for a fraud case that has stretched over years at Kenya’s Milimani Law Courts. Official records indicate that Opar was charged with obtaining money by false pretences, a case that has become notorious for its prolonged proceedings and frequent changes in judicial oversight.
Sources close to the matter describe a legal saga marked by unusual delays. Over the course of the case, more than three magistrates have presided, with one retiring before delivering a verdict. Such continuity gaps, observers say, have contributed to the perception that justice is moving at a glacial pace.
“The case has dragged for years,” says a court insider who requested anonymity. “Procedural applications, adjournments, and transfers of magistrates have created an environment where the process seems to stall indefinitely.”
Allegations surrounding Opar’s influence over the judicial process have only heightened public scrutiny. Some parties linked to the case claim that Opar has, on multiple occasions, boasted of his ability to influence investigative officers. They describe him as “untouchable,” though these claims have not been independently verified by law enforcement.
Experts in criminal law note that delays in high-profile fraud cases are not uncommon. Backlogs, changes in judicial officers, and procedural complexities often contribute to prolonged timelines. Yet, in Opar’s case, observers point to a combination of strategic legal maneuvers and alleged intimidation as factors fueling public skepticism.
Efforts to reach Opar or his legal representatives for comment some few weeks back were unsuccessful during the time of publishing.
Despite the uncertainty, the case continues to unfold at Milimani Law Courts. For complainants and legal observers alike, the saga is emblematic of broader concerns about accountability, transparency, and the pace of justice in complex fraud proceedings.
Whether the legal process will finally yield a resolution remains uncertain. But for those following the case, Maurice Opar’s legal battles offer a cautionary tale of how high-profile cases can become entangled in procedural complexities and public allegations of influence — leaving ordinary Kenyans questioning if justice can indeed be serve.
We shall be camping in Court to bring you more Exclusive Reports on the alledged Fraudster insider when the matter comes up for hearing.