Legal scholar and constitutional expert Makau Mutua has defended Kenya’s democratic institutions while questioning the fairness and context of recent reporting by international broadcaster Al Jazeera.
Writing in his weekly column in the Sunday Nation, Prof Mutua raised concerns about the broadcaster’s portrayal of Kenya and called for greater scrutiny of the media house’s ownership structure and editorial approach.
According to Prof Mutua, Kenya’s governance system differs significantly from that of Qatar, where Al Jazeera is based and funded.
He argued that Kenya operates under a constitutional framework that guarantees a free press, an independent Judiciary and Legislature, and a system of checks and balances designed to prevent any one arm of government from exercising unchecked power.
“Kenya is not perfect, but it remains a democracy in progress where leaders are elected by citizens and can be held accountable through established constitutional and electoral processes,” he wrote.
The scholar also weighed in on the debate surrounding surveillance and national security, arguing that governments have a responsibility to use lawful monitoring mechanisms to protect citizens from security threats.
He compared surveillance systems to security measures employed by homeowners, such as hiring guards, installing cameras, and reinforcing their homes to deter crime and investigate incidents when they occur.
Prof Mutua further challenged Al Jazeera to devote similar attention to labour and human rights concerns in Qatar, particularly the treatment of migrant workers, many of whom come from African countries.
He argued that a balanced global conversation on governance, rights and accountability should also examine conditions facing foreign workers in Gulf states alongside criticisms directed at African democracies.
The comments come amid ongoing debate over international media coverage of governance, security and human rights issues in Kenya, with Prof Mutua maintaining that while the country faces challenges, its democratic institutions remain open to scrutiny, public participation and constitutional oversight.